STONEHENGE III ROOF STRUCTURE

 
 

STONEHENGE ROOF STRUCTURE: PART TWO

D) Spanning joists are laid and secured to rafters.

Again note the resultant similarity to the Salish pithouse, (below).


 

 

 

 

 

Detail of the centre of the roof:


Note that the non-linear increase in
the  heights of stones 55 and 56, (relative to the rest of the central trilithons), causes an anomaly,
(a bump) in one side of the roof.
 

 

This anomaly, (which may, at first, look like an error in design), turns out to
form an excellent cowling for the smoke hole, which will cause the smoke hole
 to draw better.  For this arrangement to work best, the back of the cowling
should face into the prevailing wind. This is exactly what we find at the site: the
prevailing wind on Salisbury Plain comes from the south-west. The cowling
has its back facing into the wind. This arrangement of the log rafters for this
section also provides more volume of backfill to be placed on the south-west
side. This means more insulation on the side facing into the wind as is sensible.

 This cowling arrangement suggests the question:
Was Stonehenge oriented towards the midsummer sunrise because , (well choose your theory here; calendar, solar observatory, lunar observatory, sun worship, etc. etc.),
or
Was the midsummer sunrise direction a simple way to remember which way to orient your shelter so that your best insulation and smoke hole cowling are facing into the wind as would be sensible?
It would be easy to pass this information from generation to generation:
"If you want to stay warm, face the midsummer sunrise
and your back will be into the wind."

 
 

 

E) Final covering of branches, sod,
 rubble and clay is placed over the structure.

That this resultant uber-pithouse is also suggestive of a "super-barrow" is not a observation that should be fleetingly regarded. 

Traditionally held dogma tells us that the hundreds of barrows surrounding Stonehenge are all tombs and that not a trace of the locals' dwellings survive.
This, of course, can be understood to be extremely unlikely, at best.
The next chapter explores the barrows as dwellings and the rash of plagues prevalent at the time
that might have ultimately resulted in the majority finally ending up as tombs.

 

Alternate Version

As would be similar to many other barrows constructions, (Maes Howe being a classic example),

 the spaces between the ring sarsens could have been walled up and the area surrounding backfilled with rubble. This uses a much smaller amount of timber for the central roofed area but does still result in the cowling contour..

 
 
  RETURN TO PREVIOUS PAGE